daveberta.ca – Alberta Politics Menu Skip to content Home About Alberta Election 2019 Innisfail-Sylvan Lake By-Election Fort McMurray-Conklin by-election alison redford’s big opportunity. 6 Replies (Re)Enter Mister Fjeldheim. There has been a certain amount of attention focused on Alberta’s Chief Electoral Officer and his comments regarding his philosophy towards his newly re-inherited position. Brian Fjeldheim, who held the position from 1998 to 2005, was recently reappointed following the dismissal of his more activist successor-turned-predecessor Lorne Gibson. After re-assuming his role last week, Mr. Fjeldheim was a little more reserved when describing his role in advocating the importance of the vote to Albertans (60% of Albertans did not vote in the 2008 election). Dave Breakenridge offered some thoughts on Mr. Fjeldhiem’s comments in today’s Calgary Sun. Open up the Elections Act. In the next few weeks, Justice Minister Alison Redford is expected to introduce legislative amendments to Alberta’s aging Elections Act. Minister Redford has said that the amendments will include some of the 182 recommended changes submitted by Mr. Gibson before his departure (but will not include fixed election dates). Of course, the recommendations included in the Bill will have be carefully chosen and measured for political impact by Minister Redford and her PC cabinet colleagues. Minister Redford’s amendments will likely include changes to how Returning Officers are chosen. During the 2008 election, it was revealed that the PC Party had provided lists of candidates for Returning Officers to the Elections Office (over half of the appointed Returning Officers had partisan connections to the PC Party). Elections procedures can be improved through legislation, but democratic participation can be strengthened through meaningful engagement. In September 2007, the Government of New Zealand tried something completely different. As an innovative way to capture the views of the public on what a new Policing Act should look like, the Ministry of Justice launched an online Wiki. This Wiki allowed citizens from across that country to contribute their ideas and collaborate in the creation of new legislation. What better way to reinvigorate our Elections Act than by opening up the amendment process to allow Albertans to collaborate by contributing their ideas for changes and improvements? What better opportunity to do things differently in than by allowing Albertans to invest their own ideas into the development of the important piece of legislation that will decide how their elections are structured? Is there a more meaningful piece of legislation that could be opened up to public collaboration than the Elections Act? Would this kind of online collaboration succeed in Alberta? There is only one way to find out. Prior to entering elected office in 2008, Minister Redford cultivated an international legal career helping build democracies in countries around the globe (including as one of four international election commissioners appointed by the Secretary General of the United Nations to administer Afghanistan’s first parliamentary elections in September 2005). Legislative amendments can improve structure, but opening up the Elections Act to real public collaboration could be Minister Redford’s big opportunity to create more meaningful democratic participation in Alberta. Making it easier for students to vote. I am sure that there would be no shortage of Albertans who would contribute their ideas to an open dialogue on improving our Elections Act. The Council of Alberta University Students submitted a handful of recommendations (pdf) to Minister Redford last year when they heard about the upcoming legislative amendments. Each of the five recommendations have been adopted by Elections officials in provinces across Canada (though no jurisdiction has adopted all five). The recommendations would improve access to a voting demographic that due to its geographic transience, are likely to face barriers and challenges to participating in elections. These are good recommendation, most of which would require minor administrative changes that are not anything that a little Alberta ingenuity could not overcome. Decreasing barriers to voting for younger Albertans will create a positive culture of participating in elections and could help create life-long voters – a group that is increasingly becoming a minority in Alberta elections. I hope to see some of these positive improvements included among Minister Redford’s amendments. Coming Soon: New Maps. Alberta’s Electoral Boundaries Commission is due to release its interim report by February 26, 2010. This entry was posted in Alberta Electoral Boundary Review, Alison Redford, Brian Fjeldheim, Lorne Gibson and tagged Alison Redford, Brian Fjeldheim, Lorne Gibson on February 23, 2010 by Dave Cournoyer. Post navigation ← breakfast with the new alberta party. alberta politics notes 2/24/2010 → 6 thoughts on “alison redford’s big opportunity.” Buddie Dharma February 23, 2010 at 6:18 am Increase opportunities for young Albertans to vote? Are you insane? The next thing you know they'd all go out and vote for the wrong party! The idea – seriously folks – is to suppress the vote while getting your loyalists out. It's the strategy of the American Republicans, and its the strategy of both the federal and provincial branches of the American Party of Canada. Reply ↓ Ty Lund's Bonus Pay February 23, 2010 at 9:14 am Why doesn't the government setup a meaningfully engaging word cloud wiki and provide word cloud hansard after every days session. Reply ↓ Anonymous February 23, 2010 at 5:26 pm You seem to imply that decreasing barriers for younger voters will increase younger voter turnout. Is there data to support this? Based on the chart, is it evident that BC has a higher portion of younger voters casting ballots? Reply ↓ Anonymous February 23, 2010 at 5:37 pm That's some excellent paradigm shifting, TLBP! We should have a dialogue about it! Reply ↓ Bob McInnis February 23, 2010 at 5:56 pm Is there data from the New Zealand wiki experience showing whether the feedback and input was diverse and from a large sample or is it just a different elitist group forming policy? Reply ↓ Alvin February 24, 2010 at 1:33 am As the disarming Tom Flanagan, who organized Harper's campaign in 2004and is one of the key people behind Danielle Smith, said at a recent conference that I attended: 'If young people were voting, they'd probably be voting NDP and Green. So we're happy that they don't.' We'll see if Alison Redford thinks any differently and if she can convince her premier that encouraging more people to vote is a worthwhile objective. Alvin Finkel Reply ↓ Leave a Reply to Alvin Cancel reply Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked * Comment Name * Email * Website Search for: Dave Cournoyer is a writer and political watcher living in Edmonton, Alberta. Contact him at david.cournoyer@gmail.com. Subscribe to The Daveberta Podcast Support daveberta.ca Recent Posts Sunday Night Candidate Nomination Update Through the Looking Glass – NDP cabinet ministers awkwardly join pro-pipeline, pro-UCP rally Episode 9: Rachel Notley, Jason Kenney and 12 months until the next election Kinder Morgan drops a Sunday afternoon bombshell in the never-ending Trans Mountain Pipeline dispute Updates: Innisfail-Sylvan Lake and Fort McMurray-Conklin by-elections. Jane Stroud expected to seek NDP nomination. Recent Comments Mike in Edmonton on Through the Looking Glass – NDP cabinet ministers awkwardly join pro-pipeline, pro-UCP rally David on Through the Looking Glass – NDP cabinet ministers awkwardly join pro-pipeline, pro-UCP rally Beck on Through the Looking Glass – NDP cabinet ministers awkwardly join pro-pipeline, pro-UCP rally Sam Gunsch on Through the Looking Glass – NDP cabinet ministers awkwardly join pro-pipeline, pro-UCP rally Chris on Kinder Morgan drops a Sunday afternoon bombshell in the never-ending Trans Mountain Pipeline dispute daveberta.ca Tweets by @davecournoyer The opinions expressed on this blog represent my own and not those of my employer or any organization I may be affiliated with. In addition, my thoughts and opinions change from time to time. I consider this a necessary consequence of having an open mind. This blog is intended to provide a semi-permanent point in time snapshot and manifestation of the various ideas running around my brain, and as such any thoughts and opinions expressed within out-of-date posts may not the same, nor even similar, to those I may hold today. Proudly powered by WordPress